Importance of accurately assessing biomechanics of the cornea.
AI Summary
Corneal biomechanics impact refractive surgery outcomes and IOP measurement accuracy. Altered corneas, especially after thinning, invalidate standard IOP readings, requiring alternative technologies for reliable assessment.
Abstract
Purpose of review: This article summarizes the state-of-the-art in clinical corneal biomechanics, including procedures in which biomechanics play a role, and the clinical consequences in terms of error in estimating intraocular pressure (IOP).
Recent findings: Corneal biomechanical response to refractive surgery can be categorized into either stable alteration of surface shape and thus visual outcome, or unstable biomechanical decompensation. The stable response is characterized by central flattening and peripheral steepening that is potentiated in a stiffer cornea. Two clinical devices for assessing corneal biomechanics do not yet measure classic biomechanical properties, but rather provide assessment of corneal deformation response. Biomechanical parameters are a function of IOP, and both the cornea and sclera become stiffer as IOP increases. Any assessment of biomechanical parameters must include IOP, and one value of stiffness does not adequately characterize a cornea.
Summary
Corneal biomechanics plays a role in the outcomes of any procedure in which lamellae are transected. Once the corneal structure has been altered in a manner that includes central thinning, IOP measurements with applanation tonometry are likely not valid, and other technologies should be used.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
Corneal biomechanical response to refractive surgery can be categorized into either stable alteration of surface shape and visual outcome, or unstable biomechanical decompensation, with the stable response characterized by central flattening and peripheral steepening that is potentiated in a stiffer cornea.
Two clinical devices for assessing corneal biomechanics do not yet measure classic biomechanical properties but rather provide assessment of corneal deformation response.
Biomechanical parameters are a function of intraocular pressure (IOP), and both the cornea and sclera become stiffer as IOP increases, implying that any assessment of biomechanical parameters must include IOP, and one value of stiffness does not adequately characterize a cornea.
Corneal biomechanics plays a role in the outcomes of any procedure in which lamellae are transected.
Once the corneal structure has been altered in a manner that includes central thinning, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with applanation tonometry are likely not valid, and other technologies should be used.
Related Articles5
Development and Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Model to Set Target IOP for Glaucoma.
Observational StudyThe relationship between intraocular pressure and glaucoma: An evolving concept.
ReviewLong-term Safety and Performance of a Suprachoroidal Pressure Sensor System: Results of the EYEMATE-SC Trial Follow-up Study.
Clinical TrialGlaucoma Home Self-Testing Using VR Visual Fields and Rebound Tonometry Versus In-Clinic Perimetry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Pilot Study.
Clinical TrialContinuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring in normal Chinese adults using a novel contact lens sensor system.
Observational StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.