Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaJanuary 201619 citations

Evaluation of the "IS" Rule to Differentiate Glaucomatous Eyes From Normal.

Law Simon K, Kornmann Helen L, Nilforushan Naveed, Moghimi Sasan, Caprioli Joseph


AI Summary

This study compared ISNT and IS rules for glaucoma detection. The IS rule, particularly with increased cup-to-disc ratio, improved specificity for differentiating advanced glaucoma, aiding clinical diagnosis.

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the accuracy of the "ISNT" rule [neural rim width of inferior(I)≥superior(S)≥nasal(N)≥temporal(T) regions] and the abbreviated variant, the "IS" rule (inferior≥superior regions) to differentiate normal from glaucomatous eyes.

Materials and methods

Medical records of patients who were evaluated in 2011, had glaucomatous optic neuropathy and visual field defects, on glaucoma treatment, and had stereoscopic optic disc photographs were reviewed. Optic discs with focal complete loss of neural rim or long axis rotated >30 degrees from vertical meridian, and patients with ≥5 D of myopia or any retinal pathology or nonglaucomatous optic neuropathy were excluded. One eye per patient was randomly enrolled. Normal control eyes were also included. Rim widths were measured with an image processing program (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health) in a masked manner. The sensitivity and specificity of the ISNT rule, the IS rule, and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) were compared.

Results

A total of 134 glaucoma and 110 normal eyes were enrolled. The mean CDRs of the glaucoma and normal eyes were 0.65±0.13 and 0.39±0.15, respectively. Sensitivities of the ISNT and IS rules were 85% and 41%, respectively, whereas specificities were 46% and 85%, respectively. Application of the IS rule in eyes with larger CDR (>0.57) increased the specificity of the IS rule to 93% while keeping the sensitivity at 41%. When ISNT or IS rule and CDR>0.57 were combined in differentiating normal from glaucomatous eyes for the entire sample, specificities approached 90% and 99%, respectively.

Conclusions

The ISNT rule alone has a high sensitivity but relatively low specificity. Application of the IS rule in eyes with increased CDR yields a much higher specificity for differentiating normal from more advanced glaucomatous eyes. A combination of different features of the optic disc (increase of CDR and ISNT or IS rule) improves the specificity of optic disc evaluation for glaucoma.


MeSH Terms

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHealthy VolunteersHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOptic DiskOptic Nerve DiseasesRetinal Ganglion CellsSensitivity and SpecificityUnited States

Key Concepts5

In a study of 134 glaucoma and 110 normal eyes, the ISNT rule (neural rim width of inferior(I) ≥ superior(S) ≥ nasal(N) ≥ temporal(T) regions) had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 46% for differentiating normal from glaucomatous eyes.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=134 glaucoma and 110 normal eyesCh5Ch7Ch11

In a study of 134 glaucoma and 110 normal eyes, the IS rule (inferior ≥ superior regions) had a sensitivity of 41% and a specificity of 85% for differentiating normal from glaucomatous eyes.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=134 glaucoma and 110 normal eyesCh5Ch7Ch11

In a study of 134 glaucoma and 110 normal eyes, applying the IS rule (inferior ≥ superior regions) in eyes with a larger cup-to-disc ratio (CDR > 0.57) increased the specificity of the IS rule to 93% while keeping the sensitivity at 41% for differentiating normal from glaucomatous eyes.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=134 glaucoma and 110 normal eyesCh5Ch7Ch11

In a study of 134 glaucoma and 110 normal eyes, combining the ISNT rule or IS rule with a cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) > 0.57 for differentiating normal from glaucomatous eyes resulted in specificities approaching 90% and 99%, respectively.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=134 glaucoma and 110 normal eyesCh5Ch7Ch11

A retrospective study reviewed medical records of patients evaluated in 2011, including 134 eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and visual field defects on glaucoma treatment, and 110 normal control eyes, to compare the accuracy of the ISNT rule and IS rule.

MethodologyCross-sectionalRetrospective Cross-sectional studyn=134 glaucoma and 110 normal eyesCh5Ch10

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.