Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Br J OphthalmolMay 201742 citations

Safety and efficacy of a low-cost glaucoma drainage device for refractory childhood glaucoma.

Kaushik Sushmita, Kataria Pankaj, Raj Srishti, Pandav Surinder Singh, Ram Jagat


AI Summary

This study found a low-cost glaucoma device (AADI) effectively lowered intraocular pressure in children with refractory glaucoma, showing comparable safety and efficacy to more expensive implants, offering a viable treatment option.

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a low-cost glaucoma drainage device (GDD), Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI), similar in design to the Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI), in refractory childhood glaucoma.

Methods

This prospective interventional study was conducted in a tertiary care postgraduate teaching institute. Children aged <16 years with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) refractory to medical treatment and considered at high risk of failure following trabeculectomy were recruited. Eligible children were implanted with the AADI. Those completing minimum 6-month follow-up were included. Main outcome measures were IOP reduction from preoperative values and postoperative complications.

Results

34 eyes of 31 patients were analysed. Average follow-up was 18.3±6.9 months. Mean IOP reduced from 27.4±7.5 mm Hg on maximum medication to 14.6±10.74 mm Hg, 13.8±7.5 mm Hg, 12.8±5.6 mm Hg and 14.7±5.8 mm Hg at 1 week, 6 months, 1 year (32 eyes of 29 children) and 2 years (25 eyes of 22 children) postoperatively, respectively (p<0.001). The cumulative probability of success was 91.18% at 6 months and 81.7% at 18-24 months. Mean number of topical medications decreased from 3.1±0.6 to 1.8±1.3 at 6 months and 1.6±1.1 at 24 months (p<0.001). Preoperatively, 25 patients required systemic acetazolamide, decreasing to three patients at 2 years. There was no tube erosion or infection. One eye developed retinal detachment.

Conclusion

The AADI appears to be a viable low-cost GDD with effectiveness and safety profile comparable with published reports of the BGI and Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in children.


MeSH Terms

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCosts and Cost AnalysisEquipment SafetyFemaleFiltering SurgeryFollow-Up StudiesGlaucomaGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsHumansInfantIntraocular PressureMaleProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignTime FactorsTonometry, OcularTrabeculectomyTreatment OutcomeVisual Acuity

Key Concepts5

The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) in 34 eyes of 31 children with refractory childhood glaucoma treated with the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) decreased from a preoperative value of 27.4±7.5 mm Hg on maximum medication to 14.6±10.74 mm Hg at 1 week, 13.8±7.5 mm Hg at 6 months, 12.8±5.6 mm Hg at 1 year (32 eyes of 29 children), and 14.7±5.8 mm Hg at 2 years (25 eyes of 22 children) postoperatively (p<0.001).

TreatmentCohortProspective interventional studyn=34 eyes of 31 patientsCh42Ch43

The cumulative probability of success for the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) in refractory childhood glaucoma was 91.18% at 6 months and 81.7% at 18-24 months.

TreatmentCohortProspective interventional studyn=34 eyes of 31 patientsCh42Ch43

The mean number of topical medications for refractory childhood glaucoma decreased from 3.1±0.6 preoperatively to 1.8±1.3 at 6 months and 1.6±1.1 at 24 months (p<0.001) following implantation of the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI).

TreatmentCohortProspective interventional studyn=34 eyes of 31 patientsCh42Ch43

Preoperatively, 25 patients with refractory childhood glaucoma required systemic acetazolamide, which decreased to three patients at 2 years following implantation of the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI).

TreatmentCohortProspective interventional studyn=34 eyes of 31 patientsCh42Ch43

Among 34 eyes of 31 children with refractory childhood glaucoma treated with the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI), there was no tube erosion or infection, and one eye developed retinal detachment.

TreatmentCohortProspective interventional studyn=34 eyes of 31 patientsCh42Ch43

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.