Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J Cataract Refract SurgFebruary 201820 citations

Effect of supplementary implantation of a sulcus-fixated intraocular lens in patients with negative dysphotopsia.

Makhotkina Natalia Y, Dugrain Vincent, Purchase Daniel, Berendschot Tos T J M, Nuijts Rudy M M A


AI Summary

This study found that a sulcus-fixated IOL for negative dysphotopsia resolved symptoms by increasing peripheral light irradiance, especially with small pupils, which optical modeling predicted.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether the outcome of negative dysphotopsia treatment by implantation of a Sulcoflex intraocular lens (IOL) can be understood using individual biometry and optical modeling data.

Setting

University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Design

Retrospective case series.

Methods

Patients with negative dysphotopsia were treated with supplementary implantation of a sulcus-fixated IOL. Preoperative and postoperative ray-tracing optical models of eyes with negative dysphotopsia were constructed in the Zemax Optic Studio program using individual biometric data. The relationship between biometric parameters, ray-tracing data, and the course of negative dysphotopsia was evaluated.

Results

The study comprised 8 patients (10 eyes). After surgery, negative dysphotopsia resolved completely in 6 eyes, partially in 2 eyes, and persisted in 2 eyes. There was no relationship between the course of negative dysphotopsia and age, IOL power, or individual biometry results other than a larger angle κ that was observed in 2 patients with persistent negative dysphotopsia after surgery. Preoperative ray-tracing models showed a decrease in light irradiance at the periphery relative to the center of visual field. After sulcus-fixated IOL implantation, this decrease partially resolved, in particular, for a small pupil aperture (P < .05), and it was more prominent in patients in whom negative dysphotopsia resolved completely than in those with partial or persistent negative dysphotopsia (P = .065 at 1.5 mm aperture).

Conclusions

Of all individual biometry results, only angle κ showed a relationship with the course of negative dysphotopsia. In patient-specific optical modeling of sulcus-fixated IOL implantation, the increase in simulated light irradiance at the periphery was related to the course of negative dysphotopsia.


MeSH Terms

AgedBiometryFemaleHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularLenses, IntraocularMaleMiddle AgedPhacoemulsificationPseudophakiaReoperationRetinaRetrospective StudiesSuture TechniquesVision DisordersVisual Field TestsVisual Fields

Key Concepts4

Supplementary implantation of a sulcus-fixated intraocular lens (Sulcoflex IOL) resolved negative dysphotopsia completely in 6 out of 10 eyes, partially in 2 eyes, and it persisted in 2 eyes in a retrospective case series of 8 patients (10 eyes).

TreatmentCase seriesRetrospective case seriesn=8 patients (10 eyes)Ch19Ch28

In patients treated with supplementary implantation of a sulcus-fixated intraocular lens for negative dysphotopsia, a larger angle κ was observed in 2 patients with persistent negative dysphotopsia after surgery, suggesting a relationship between angle κ and the course of negative dysphotopsia.

PrognosisCase seriesRetrospective case seriesn=8 patients (10 eyes)Ch19Ch28

After sulcus-fixated intraocular lens implantation for negative dysphotopsia, the decrease in light irradiance at the periphery partially resolved, particularly for a small pupil aperture (P < 0.05), and was more prominent in patients where negative dysphotopsia resolved completely than in those with partial or persistent negative dysphotopsia (P = 0.065 at 1.5 mm aperture).

MechanismBasic ScienceRetrospective case seriesn=8 patients (10 eyes)Ch19Ch28

Preoperative ray-tracing models of eyes with negative dysphotopsia showed a decrease in light irradiance at the periphery relative to the center of the visual field.

MechanismBasic ScienceRetrospective case seriesn=8 patients (10 eyes)Ch19

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.