Effect of supplementary implantation of a sulcus-fixated intraocular lens in patients with negative dysphotopsia.
Makhotkina Natalia Y, Dugrain Vincent, Purchase Daniel, Berendschot Tos T J M, Nuijts Rudy M M A
AI Summary
This study found that a sulcus-fixated IOL for negative dysphotopsia resolved symptoms by increasing peripheral light irradiance, especially with small pupils, which optical modeling predicted.
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate whether the outcome of negative dysphotopsia treatment by implantation of a Sulcoflex intraocular lens (IOL) can be understood using individual biometry and optical modeling data.
Setting
University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Design
Retrospective case series.
Methods
Patients with negative dysphotopsia were treated with supplementary implantation of a sulcus-fixated IOL. Preoperative and postoperative ray-tracing optical models of eyes with negative dysphotopsia were constructed in the Zemax Optic Studio program using individual biometric data. The relationship between biometric parameters, ray-tracing data, and the course of negative dysphotopsia was evaluated.
Results
The study comprised 8 patients (10 eyes). After surgery, negative dysphotopsia resolved completely in 6 eyes, partially in 2 eyes, and persisted in 2 eyes. There was no relationship between the course of negative dysphotopsia and age, IOL power, or individual biometry results other than a larger angle κ that was observed in 2 patients with persistent negative dysphotopsia after surgery. Preoperative ray-tracing models showed a decrease in light irradiance at the periphery relative to the center of visual field. After sulcus-fixated IOL implantation, this decrease partially resolved, in particular, for a small pupil aperture (P < .05), and it was more prominent in patients in whom negative dysphotopsia resolved completely than in those with partial or persistent negative dysphotopsia (P = .065 at 1.5 mm aperture).
Conclusions
Of all individual biometry results, only angle κ showed a relationship with the course of negative dysphotopsia. In patient-specific optical modeling of sulcus-fixated IOL implantation, the increase in simulated light irradiance at the periphery was related to the course of negative dysphotopsia.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
Supplementary implantation of a sulcus-fixated intraocular lens (Sulcoflex IOL) resolved negative dysphotopsia completely in 6 out of 10 eyes, partially in 2 eyes, and it persisted in 2 eyes in a retrospective case series of 8 patients (10 eyes).
In patients treated with supplementary implantation of a sulcus-fixated intraocular lens for negative dysphotopsia, a larger angle κ was observed in 2 patients with persistent negative dysphotopsia after surgery, suggesting a relationship between angle κ and the course of negative dysphotopsia.
After sulcus-fixated intraocular lens implantation for negative dysphotopsia, the decrease in light irradiance at the periphery partially resolved, particularly for a small pupil aperture (P < 0.05), and was more prominent in patients where negative dysphotopsia resolved completely than in those with partial or persistent negative dysphotopsia (P = 0.065 at 1.5 mm aperture).
Preoperative ray-tracing models of eyes with negative dysphotopsia showed a decrease in light irradiance at the periphery relative to the center of the visual field.
Related Articles5
Effect of yellow-tinted intraocular lenses on short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Cross-Sectional StudyObjective evaluation of negative dysphotopsia with Goldmann kinetic perimetry.
Case-Control StudyFACTORS RELATED TO UNFAVORABLE VISUAL OUTCOME AFTER IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH GLAUCOMA.
Cohort StudyGlaucoma with severe field loss at presentation? To operate or not to operate … that is the question.
EditorialEvaluating High Intraocular Pressure Criteria for Failure in Glaucoma Surgery: Impact on Estimated Success and Visual Field Rates.
Systematic ReviewIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.