Pointwise Methods to Measure Long-term Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.
Salazar Diana, Morales Esteban, Rabiolo Alessandro, Capistrano Vicente, Lin Mark, Afifi Abdelmonem A, Yu Fei, Nouri-Mahdavi Kouros, Caprioli Joseph
AI Summary
This study compared three methods for detecting glaucoma progression, finding the Glaucoma Rate Index (GRI) identifies visual field loss earlier than other methods, potentially enabling timelier treatment decisions.
Abstract
Importance
Rates of visual field (VF) progression vary among patients with glaucoma. Knowing the rate of progression of individual patients would allow appropriately aggressive therapy for patients with high rates of visual loss and protect those with low rates from unnecessary therapy.
Objective
To compare 3 pointwise methods of estimating the rate of VF progression in glaucoma.
Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective, observational cohort study included 729 eyes of 567 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma who had at least 6 reliable VFs and at least 3 years of follow-up. One hundred seventy-six patients (257 eyes) were treated at a tertiary glaucoma center; in addition, data were collected from 391 participants (472 eyes) in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Data were collected from May 1988 to November 2004 and analyzed from October 2018 to February 2019.
Exposures: Estimates of VF progression were measured with guided progression analysis (GPA), pointwise linear regression (PLR), and the glaucoma rate index (GRI). A subgroup analysis was performed in a subset of patients with likely VF progression and likely VF stability.
Main outcomes and measures: Proportion of VF series detected as progressing, estimates of false-positive proportions, time to detect progression, and agreement among measures.
Results
Among the 567 patients included in the analysis, mean (SD) age was 65.6 (9.7) years, 300 (52.9%) were female, and 295 (52.0%) were white. The median baseline mean deviation was -6.7 (interquartile range [IQR], -11.6 to -3.5) dB; the median follow-up time, 8.9 (IQR, 7.3-10.4) years. The proportion of eyes labeled as progressing was 27.7% according to the GPA, 33.5% according to the PLR, and 52.9% according to the GRI; pairwise differences for GRI vs PLR were 20% (95% CI, 17%-23%); for GRI vs GPA, 25% (95% CI, 22%-29%); and for PLR vs GPA, 6% (95% CI, 3%-9%; P < .001 for all comparisons, McNemar test). The shortest median time to progression was with the GRI (8.8 [IQR, 2.4-10.5 years), compared with the GPA and PLR (both >16 years). The hazard ratio of VF progression for GRI vs PLR (reference) was 11.3 (95% CI, 9.2-13.7); for GRI vs GPA (reference), 18.1 (95% CI, 14.5-22.6); and for PLR vs GPA (reference), 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3-1.9; P < .001 for all comparisons, Cox proportional hazards regression). These results held in the subgroup with likely progression; the proportions of progressing eyes were 73.7% (115 of 156) for GPA, 81.4% (127 of 156) for PLR, and 92.9% (145 of 156) for GRI. Pairwise difference for GRI vs PLR was 11.5% (95% CI, 7.4%-17.6%; P < .001, McNemar test); for GRI vs GPA, 19.2% (95% CI, 12.6%-26.4%; P < .001, McNemar test); and for PLR vs GPA, 7.7% (95% CI, 0.3%-15.7%; P = .08, McNemar test).
Conclusions and relevance: These results suggest GRI can detect long-term VF progression in glaucoma earlier than PLR or GPA. Validation with prospective designs may strengthen the generalizability and value of this method.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
Among 567 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, the proportion of eyes labeled as progressing was 27.7% according to guided progression analysis (GPA), 33.5% according to pointwise linear regression (PLR), and 52.9% according to the glaucoma rate index (GRI).
In 567 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, pairwise differences in the proportion of eyes labeled as progressing were 20% (95% CI, 17%-23%) for GRI vs PLR, 25% (95% CI, 22%-29%) for GRI vs GPA, and 6% (95% CI, 3%-9%) for PLR vs GPA (P < .001 for all comparisons, McNemar test).
The shortest median time to visual field progression in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma was with the glaucoma rate index (GRI) at 8.8 (IQR, 2.4-10.5) years, compared with guided progression analysis (GPA) and pointwise linear regression (PLR) (both >16 years).
The hazard ratio of visual field progression for glaucoma rate index (GRI) vs pointwise linear regression (PLR) (reference) was 11.3 (95% CI, 9.2-13.7) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma; for GRI vs guided progression analysis (GPA) (reference), 18.1 (95% CI, 14.5-22.6); and for PLR vs GPA (reference), 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3-1.9; P < .001 for all comparisons, Cox proportional hazards regression).
In a subgroup of 156 eyes from patients with primary open-angle glaucoma with likely visual field progression, the proportions of progressing eyes were 73.7% (115 of 156) for guided progression analysis (GPA), 81.4% (127 of 156) for pointwise linear regression (PLR), and 92.9% (145 of 156) for the glaucoma rate index (GRI).
Related Articles5
Detection of glaucoma progression on longitudinal series of en-face macular optical coherence tomography angiography images with a deep learning model.
Cohort StudyOptic Disc Microvasculature Reduction and Visual Field Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Case SeriesDecreased macular deep capillary plexus is associated with functional progression of normal tension glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field loss.
Longitudinal StudyLongitudinal changes in optical coherence tomography angiography characteristics in normal-tension glaucoma with or without high myopia.
Cohort StudyFrequency of Agreement Between Structural and Functional Glaucoma Testing: A Longitudinal Study of 3D OCT and Current Clinical Tests.
Cohort StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.