Vision-Related Quality of Life Among Healthy, Preperimetric Glaucoma, and Perimetric Glaucoma Patients.
Nishida Takashi, Moghimi Sasan, Yamane Maya L M, Wu Jo-Hsuan, Mohammadzadeh Vahid, Kamalipour Alireza, Mahmoudinezhad Golnoush, Liebmann Jeffrey M, Fazio Massimo A, Girkin Christopher A
AI Summary
This study found perimetric and preperimetric glaucoma patients have worse VRQOL than healthy individuals, with central visual field loss, not GCC thickness, being more strongly associated.
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the association of vision-related quality of life (VRQOL) with the central visual field and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in healthy control participants, patients with preperimetric glaucoma, and patients with perimetric glaucoma.
Design
Retrospective cross-sectional study.
Methods
A total of 39 healthy, 34 preperimetric glaucoma, and 145 perimetric glaucoma patients completed the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). A linear mixed-effect models was used to investigate the association between the glaucoma stage as measured by binocular 10-2 visual field mean sensitivity (VFMS) and GCC thickness with the Rasch-calibrated NEI-VFQ score.
Results
A total of 436 eyes from 218 participants (mean age = 67.2 [95% CI = 65.1 to 69.2] years) were enrolled. VRQOL calculated by the NEI-VFQ Rasch-calibrated score was worst for patients with perimetric glaucoma (50.7 [95% CI = 47.2 to 54.2]), followed by patients with preperimetric glaucoma (41.2 [95% CI = 34.5 to 47.9]) and healthy controls (29.3 [95% CI = 24.0 to 34.7]. Worse VRQOL had a moderate association with a worse global binocular 10-2 VFMS (-3.4 [95% CI = -5.0 to -1.9] dB per 1 score; P < .001; adjusted R 2 = 0.27), but not with a thinner global GCC in the better eye (-0.1 [95% CI = -0.2 to 0.1] µm per 1 score; P =.0485; adjusted R 2 = 0.17).
Conclusions
These findings suggest that patients with perimetric and preperimetric glaucoma have worse VRQOL than patients with healthy eyes. As compared to macular thickness measurements, the central visual field is more strongly associated with VRQOL and may better help to identify patients in need of intervention.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
Vision-related quality of life (VRQOL) calculated by the NEI-VFQ Rasch-calibrated score was worst for patients with perimetric glaucoma (50.7 [95% CI = 47.2 to 54.2]), followed by patients with preperimetric glaucoma (41.2 [95% CI = 34.5 to 47.9]) and healthy controls (29.3 [95% CI = 24.0 to 34.7]) in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 218 participants.
Worse vision-related quality of life (VRQOL) had a moderate association with a worse global binocular 10-2 visual field mean sensitivity (VFMS) (-3.4 [95% CI = -5.0 to -1.9] dB per 1 score; P < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.27) in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 218 participants.
Worse vision-related quality of life (VRQOL) did not have a strong association with a thinner global macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) in the better eye (-0.1 [95% CI = -0.2 to 0.1] µm per 1 score; P =.0485; adjusted R2 = 0.17) in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 218 participants.
The central visual field is more strongly associated with vision-related quality of life (VRQOL) and may better help to identify patients in need of intervention compared to macular thickness measurements in patients with perimetric and preperimetric glaucoma, based on a retrospective cross-sectional study of 218 participants.
Related Articles5
A traffic perimetry test that adheres to the European visual field requirements for group 2 drivers.
Observational StudyVisual field assessment and the Austroads driving standard.
Observational StudyVisual field testing and fitness to drive in Europe: A cross-country comparison against a potential reference standard.
Cross-Sectional StudyIs reading disability likely to interfere with glaucoma screening of adults using frequency-doubling technology perimetry?
Cross-Sectional StudyVisual Field Progression Rates in Glaucoma: Frontloaded Versus Clinical Standard (Nonfrontloaded) SITA-Faster.
Observational StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.