Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Eye (Lond)November 20237 citations

Detection and agreement of event-based OCT and OCTA analysis for glaucoma progression.

Wu Jo-Hsuan, Moghimi Sasan, Nishida Takashi, Mahmoudinezhad Golnoush, Zangwill Linda M, Weinreb Robert N


AI Summary

OCT and OCTA poorly agreed on glaucoma progression detection, with OCT showing better visual field correlation. Both detect more progression than visual fields, offering complementary, distinct insights.

Abstract

Objective

To examine event-based glaucoma progression using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA).

Methods

In this retrospective study, glaucoma eyes with ≥2-year and 4-visits of OCT/OCTA imaging were included. Peripapillary capillary density (CD) and retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFL) were obtained from 4.5 mm × 4.5 mm optic nerve head (ONH) scans. Event-based OCT/OCTA progression was defined as decreases in ONH measurements exceeding test-retest variability on ≥2 consecutive visits. Visual field (VF) progression was defined as significant VF mean deviation worsening rates on ≥2 consecutive visits. Inter-instrument agreement on progression detection was compared using kappa(κ) statistics.

Results

Among 147 eyes (89 participants), OCTA and OCT identified 33(22%) and 25(17%) progressors, respectively. They showed slight agreement (κ = 0.06), with 7(5%) eyes categorized as progressors by both. When incorporating both instruments, the rate of progressors identified increased to 34%. Similar agreement was observed in diagnosis- and severity-stratified analyses (κ < 0.10). Compared to progressors identified only by OCT, progressors identified only by OCTA tended to have thinner baseline RNFL and worse baseline VF. VF progression was identified in 11(7%) eyes. OCT and VF showed fair agreement (κ = 0.26), with 6(4%) eyes categorized as progressors by both. OCTA and VF showed slight agreement (κ = 0.08), with 4(3%) eyes categorized as progressors by both.

Conclusions

OCT and OCTA showed limited agreement on event-based progression detection, with OCT showing better agreement with VF. Both OCT and OCTA detected more progressors than VF. OCT and OCTA may provide valuable, yet different and complementary, information about glaucoma progression.


MeSH Terms

HumansTomography, Optical CoherenceRetrospective StudiesVisual Field TestsIntraocular PressureRetinal Ganglion CellsGlaucoma

Key Concepts6

In a retrospective study of 147 glaucoma eyes (89 participants), OCTA and OCT identified 33 (22%) and 25 (17%) progressors, respectively, showing slight agreement (κ = 0.06), with 7 (5%) eyes categorized as progressors by both instruments.

DiagnosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=147 eyes (89 participants)Ch5Ch12

When incorporating both OCT and OCTA instruments for event-based glaucoma progression detection in 147 glaucoma eyes (89 participants), the rate of identified progressors increased to 34%.

DiagnosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=147 eyes (89 participants)Ch5Ch12

In a retrospective study of 147 glaucoma eyes (89 participants), progressors identified only by OCTA tended to have thinner baseline RNFL and worse baseline VF compared to progressors identified only by OCT.

PrognosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=147 eyes (89 participants)Ch5Ch6Ch12

In a retrospective study of 147 glaucoma eyes (89 participants), VF progression was identified in 11 (7%) eyes, with OCT and VF showing fair agreement (κ = 0.26) and 6 (4%) eyes categorized as progressors by both.

DiagnosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=147 eyes (89 participants)Ch5Ch6Ch12

In a retrospective study of 147 glaucoma eyes (89 participants), OCTA and VF showed slight agreement (κ = 0.08) for glaucoma progression detection, with 4 (3%) eyes categorized as progressors by both.

DiagnosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=147 eyes (89 participants)Ch5Ch6Ch12

In a retrospective study of 147 glaucoma eyes (89 participants), both OCT and OCTA detected more progressors than Visual Field (VF) analysis, suggesting they provide valuable, yet different and complementary, information about glaucoma progression.

DiagnosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=147 eyes (89 participants)Ch5Ch6Ch12

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.