Comparing IOP-Induced Scleral Deformations in the Myopic and Myopic Glaucoma Spectrums.
Chuangsuwanich Thanadet, Tun Tin A, Braeu Fabian A, Chong Rachel S, Wang Xiaofei, Ho Ching-Lin, Aung Tin, Girard Michaël J A, Hoang Quan V
AI Summary
This study found that highly myopic glaucoma, pathologic myopia, and staphyloma eyes show greater macular curvature changes from acute IOP elevation than highly myopic or emmetropic eyes, indicating increased sensitivity to pressure.
Abstract
Purpose
To compare changes in macular curvature following acute IOP elevation across a range of myopic conditions.
Methods
We studied 328 eyes from 184 subjects, comprising 32 emmetropic controls (between +2.75 and -2.75 diopters), 50 eyes with high myopia (<-5 diopters; HM), 108 highly myopic with glaucoma (HMG) and 105 pathologic myopia (PM) eyes, and 33 PM with staphyloma (PM+S) eyes. For each eye, we imaged the macula using optical coherence tomography (OCT) under the baseline condition and under acute IOP elevation (to ∼40 mm Hg) achieved through ophthalmodynamometry. We manually aligned the scans (baseline and IOP elevation) using three vascular landmarks in the macula tissue. We then automatically segmented the sclera and the choroid tissues using a deep learning algorithm and extracted the sclera-choroid interface. We calculated the macula curvatures, determined by the radius of curvature of the sclera-choroid interface in the nasal-temporal and superior-inferior direction. Differences in macula curvatures between baseline and elevated IOP scans were calculated at corresponding locations, and the mean curvature difference was reported for each eye.
Results
IOP elevation resulted in a significantly higher macula curvature change along the nasal-temporal direction in the PM+S (13.5 ± 8.2 × 10-5 µm-1), PM (9.0 ± 7.9 × 10-5 µm-1), and HMG (5.2 ± 5.1 × 10-5 µm-1) eyes as compared to HM (3.1 ± 2.7 × 10-5 µm-1) eyes (all P < 0.05). Interestingly, HM and HMG eyes had the same curvature change in the nasal-temporal direction as emmetropic control eyes (4.2 ± 4.3 × 10-5 µm-1).
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that the macula in HMG, PM, and PM+S eyes showed greater curvature changes under IOP elevation compared to HM and emmetropic eyes. These preliminary results suggest that HM eyes with conditions such as glaucoma or staphyloma are more sensitive to acute IOP elevation.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
IOP elevation to approximately 40 mm Hg resulted in a significantly higher macula curvature change along the nasal-temporal direction in eyes with pathologic myopia with staphyloma (PM+S) (13.5 ± 8.2 × 10-5 µm-1), pathologic myopia (PM) (9.0 ± 7.9 × 10-5 µm-1), and highly myopic with glaucoma (HMG) (5.2 ± 5.1 × 10-5 µm-1) as compared to highly myopic (HM) eyes (3.1 ± 2.7 × 10-5 µm-1) (all P < 0.05).
Highly myopic (HM) eyes and highly myopic with glaucoma (HMG) eyes had the same macula curvature change in the nasal-temporal direction as emmetropic control eyes (4.2 ± 4.3 × 10-5 µm-1) following acute IOP elevation.
The macula in highly myopic with glaucoma (HMG), pathologic myopia (PM), and pathologic myopia with staphyloma (PM+S) eyes showed greater curvature changes under acute IOP elevation compared to highly myopic (HM) and emmetropic eyes.
Highly myopic (HM) eyes with conditions such as glaucoma or staphyloma are more sensitive to acute IOP elevation.
Related Articles5
Factors Associated with Retinal Microvasculature Dropout Induced by Elevation of Intraocular Pressure in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Cross-Sectional StudyAssociation of Long-Term Intraocular Pressure Variability and Rate of Ganglion Complex Thinning in Patients With Glaucoma.
Cohort StudyIntraocular pressure increases the rate of macular vessel density loss in glaucoma.
Cohort StudyThe Impact of Achieving Target Intraocular Pressure on Glaucomatous Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning in a Treated Clinical Population.
Cohort StudyHIOP-Reader: Automated Data Extraction for the Analysis of Manually Recorded Nycthemeral IOPs and Glaucoma Progression.
Observational StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.