Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Clin Exp OphthalmolSeptember 20245 citations

Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards polygenic risk testing for glaucoma.

Hollitt Georgina L, Keane Miriam C, Nguyen Thi T, Hassall Mark M, Siggs Owen M, Craig Jamie E, Souzeau Emmanuelle


AI Summary

Australian healthcare professionals, despite low familiarity with glaucoma polygenic risk testing, showed positive attitudes towards its use, highlighting a critical need for education to support clinical implementation.

Abstract

Background

Effective clinical implementation of polygenic risk testing for glaucoma relies on healthcare professionals' attitudes and knowledge of the test. Given the emerging applications of the test, it will likely impact a range of healthcare professionals and will require competency in polygenic risk scores concepts for all those involved in patient care. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess healthcare professionals' views towards polygenic testing for glaucoma.

Methods

An online cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed to healthcare professionals via relevant professional organisations in Australia. The questionnaire assessed experience and confidence with genetic testing, glaucoma and genetic knowledge, recommendations for the tests, and factors affecting the decision.

Results

A total of 94 participants completed the questionnaire. The sample was composed of ophthalmologists (36%), optometrists (21%), orthoptists (17%), general practitioners (16%) and clinical geneticists/genetic counsellors (10%). Although familiarity with polygenic risk scores for glaucoma was low overall (11%), the majority reported a positive attitude towards recommending testing based on known risk factors such as family history (91%) and older age (57%). Over 95% indicated that ophthalmologists would be the most appropriate group to order polygenic risk testing and communicate results. The majority felt they would benefit from more training on polygenic risk scores (93%).

Conclusions

Our findings indicated that multiple groups of healthcare professionals were neither familiar nor confident with the concept of glaucoma polygenic risk testing, and identified training and education needs to support the implementation of testing into clinical practice.


MeSH Terms

HumansCross-Sectional StudiesGlaucomaFemaleMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultMiddle AgedGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAustraliaRisk FactorsAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelMultifactorial InheritanceRisk AssessmentClinical Competence

Key Concepts6

Familiarity with polygenic risk scores for glaucoma was low overall (11%) among 94 surveyed healthcare professionals in Australia.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional Surveyn=94 participantsCh9

The majority of 94 surveyed healthcare professionals reported a positive attitude towards recommending polygenic risk testing for glaucoma based on known risk factors such as family history (91%) and older age (57%).

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional Surveyn=94 participantsCh9Ch28

Over 95% of 94 surveyed healthcare professionals indicated that ophthalmologists would be the most appropriate group to order polygenic risk testing for glaucoma and communicate results.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional Surveyn=94 participantsCh9Ch28

The majority (93%) of 94 surveyed healthcare professionals felt they would benefit from more training on polygenic risk scores for glaucoma.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional Surveyn=94 participantsCh9Ch28

An online cross-sectional questionnaire distributed to healthcare professionals in Australia assessed experience and confidence with genetic testing, glaucoma and genetic knowledge, recommendations for polygenic risk tests for glaucoma, and factors affecting the decision.

MethodologyCross-sectionalCross-sectional Surveyn=94 participantsCh10

A total of 94 healthcare professionals completed the questionnaire, comprising ophthalmologists (36%), optometrists (21%), orthoptists (17%), general practitioners (16%), and clinical geneticists/genetic counsellors (10%).

MethodologyCross-sectionalCross-sectional Surveyn=94 participantsCh10

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.