Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards polygenic risk testing for glaucoma.
Hollitt Georgina L, Keane Miriam C, Nguyen Thi T, Hassall Mark M, Siggs Owen M, Craig Jamie E, Souzeau Emmanuelle
AI Summary
Australian healthcare professionals, despite low familiarity with glaucoma polygenic risk testing, showed positive attitudes towards its use, highlighting a critical need for education to support clinical implementation.
Abstract
Background
Effective clinical implementation of polygenic risk testing for glaucoma relies on healthcare professionals' attitudes and knowledge of the test. Given the emerging applications of the test, it will likely impact a range of healthcare professionals and will require competency in polygenic risk scores concepts for all those involved in patient care. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess healthcare professionals' views towards polygenic testing for glaucoma.
Methods
An online cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed to healthcare professionals via relevant professional organisations in Australia. The questionnaire assessed experience and confidence with genetic testing, glaucoma and genetic knowledge, recommendations for the tests, and factors affecting the decision.
Results
A total of 94 participants completed the questionnaire. The sample was composed of ophthalmologists (36%), optometrists (21%), orthoptists (17%), general practitioners (16%) and clinical geneticists/genetic counsellors (10%). Although familiarity with polygenic risk scores for glaucoma was low overall (11%), the majority reported a positive attitude towards recommending testing based on known risk factors such as family history (91%) and older age (57%). Over 95% indicated that ophthalmologists would be the most appropriate group to order polygenic risk testing and communicate results. The majority felt they would benefit from more training on polygenic risk scores (93%).
Conclusions
Our findings indicated that multiple groups of healthcare professionals were neither familiar nor confident with the concept of glaucoma polygenic risk testing, and identified training and education needs to support the implementation of testing into clinical practice.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts6
Familiarity with polygenic risk scores for glaucoma was low overall (11%) among 94 surveyed healthcare professionals in Australia.
The majority of 94 surveyed healthcare professionals reported a positive attitude towards recommending polygenic risk testing for glaucoma based on known risk factors such as family history (91%) and older age (57%).
Over 95% of 94 surveyed healthcare professionals indicated that ophthalmologists would be the most appropriate group to order polygenic risk testing for glaucoma and communicate results.
The majority (93%) of 94 surveyed healthcare professionals felt they would benefit from more training on polygenic risk scores for glaucoma.
An online cross-sectional questionnaire distributed to healthcare professionals in Australia assessed experience and confidence with genetic testing, glaucoma and genetic knowledge, recommendations for polygenic risk tests for glaucoma, and factors affecting the decision.
A total of 94 healthcare professionals completed the questionnaire, comprising ophthalmologists (36%), optometrists (21%), orthoptists (17%), general practitioners (16%), and clinical geneticists/genetic counsellors (10%).
Related Articles5
Evaluation of Sleep Quality and Fatigue in Patients with Usher Syndrome Type 2a.
Cross-Sectional StudyAttitudes Toward Glaucoma Genetic Risk Assessment in Unaffected Individuals.
Cross-Sectional StudyAttitudes to predictive DNA testing for myocilin glaucoma: experience with a large Australian family.
Observational StudyUnderstanding racial disparities of glaucoma.
ReviewThe Significance of Screening Family Members in Glaucoma: Opportunities and Challenges.
ReviewIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.