Smoking Intensity is Associated With Progressive Optic Nerve Head Vessel Density Loss in Glaucoma.
Nishida Takashi, Weinreb Robert N, Tansuebchueasai Natchada, Wu Jo-Hsuan, Meller Leo, Mahmoudinezhad Golnoush, Gunasegaran Gopikasree, Adelpour Mohsen, Moghimi Sasan
AI Summary
This study found that higher lifetime smoking intensity, particularly over 22.2 pack-years, accelerates optic nerve head vessel density loss in glaucoma, highlighting smoking as a significant progression risk factor.
Abstract
Précis: A lifetime history of greater smoking consumption was associated with faster vessel density loss over time. Smoking intensity should be considered when assessing the risk of glaucoma progression, as well as its management.
Purpose
To investigate the relationship of smoking and smoking intensity, with the rate of optic nerve head (ONH) whole image capillary density (wiCD) loss in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and glaucoma suspect patients.
Methods
In this longitudinal study, patients with POAG who had at least 2 years of follow-up and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) performed at a minimum of 4 visits were selected for study. The smoking intensity was calculated as the pack-year at the baseline OCTA. Univariable and multivariable linear mixed models were used to determine the effect of each parameter on the rates of wiCD loss over time. Nonlinear least-squares estimation with piecewise regression model was used to investigate the cutoff point for the relationship between wiCD loss and smoking intensity.
Results
One hundred sixty-four eyes (69 glaucoma suspect and 95 POAG) of 110 patients were included with a mean (95% CI) follow-up of 4.0 (3.9 to 4.1) years. Of the 110 patients, 50 (45.5%) had a reported history of smoking. Greater smoking intensity was associated with faster wiCD loss [-0.11 (-0.23 to 0.00)] %/year per 10 pack-year higher; P =0.048) after adjusting for covariates. The wiCD thinning became significantly faster when smoking intensity was greater than 22.2 pack-years. Smoking had no effect on the rate of wiCD thinning in patients who smoked <22.2 pack-years during their lifetime.
Conclusions
A history of greater smoking consumption was associated with faster vessel density loss, suggesting smoking intensity as a potential risk factor for glaucoma.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
In a longitudinal study of 164 eyes (69 glaucoma suspect and 95 POAG) of 110 patients with a mean follow-up of 4.0 years, greater smoking intensity was associated with faster whole image capillary density (wiCD) loss at a rate of -0.11 %/year per 10 pack-year higher (95% CI: -0.23 to 0.00; P =0.048) after adjusting for covariates.
In a longitudinal study of 164 eyes (69 glaucoma suspect and 95 POAG) of 110 patients, the whole image capillary density (wiCD) thinning became significantly faster when smoking intensity was greater than 22.2 pack-years.
A history of greater smoking consumption was associated with faster vessel density loss in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and glaucoma suspect patients, suggesting smoking intensity as a potential risk factor for glaucoma.
In a longitudinal study of 164 eyes (69 glaucoma suspect and 95 POAG) of 110 patients, smoking had no effect on the rate of whole image capillary density (wiCD) thinning in patients who smoked less than 22.2 pack-years during their lifetime.
Related Articles5
Ocular blood flow biomarkers may predict long-term glaucoma progression.
Cohort StudyImpact of Optic Nerve Tortuosity, Globe Proptosis, and Size on Retinal Ganglion Cell Thickness Across General, Glaucoma, and Myopic Populations.
Cohort StudyLamina Cribrosa Microstructure in Nonhuman Primates With Naturally Occurring Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning.
Observational StudyAssociation of Blood Pressure With Rates of Macular Ganglion Cell Complex Thinning in Patients With Glaucoma.
Cohort StudyAssociation of Postural Blood Pressure Response With Disease Severity in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.
Observational StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.