Predicting the Extent of Damage in the Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 Visual Fields Using 10-2 Test Results in Patients With Advanced Glaucoma.

Purpose

To predict Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 test (HFA 24-2) results using 10-2 results.

Methods

A total of 175 advanced glaucoma eyes (175 patients) with HFA 24-2 mean deviation (MD24-2) of < -20 dB were prospectively followed up for five years using HFA 10-2 and 24-2 (twice and once in a year, respectively). Using all the HFA 24-2 and 10-2 test result pairs measured within three months (350 pairs from 85 eyes, training dataset), a formula to predict HFA 24-2 result using HFA 10-2 results was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO). Using 90 different eyes (testing dataset), the absolute differences between the actual and LASSO-predicted MD24-2 and that between the slopes calculated using five actual and LASSO-predicted MD24-2 values, were adopted as the prediction error. Similar analyses were performed for the mean total deviation values (mTD) of the superior (or inferior) hemifield [hemi-mTDsup.24-2(-hemi-mTDinf.24-2)].

Results

The prediction error for the LASSO-predicted MD24-2 and its slope were 2.98 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.90) dB and 0.32 (0.33) dB/yr, respectively. The LASSO-predicted hemi-mTDsup.24-2 (hemi-mTDinf.24-2), and its slope were 3.02 (2.89) and 3.76 (2.72) dB, and 0.37 (0.41) and 0.44 (0.38) dB/year, respectively. These prediction errors were within two times SD of repeatability of the simulated stable HFA 24-2 VF parameter series.

Conclusions

HFA 24-2 results could be predicted using the paired HFA 10-2 results with reasonable accuracy using LASSO in patients with advanced glaucoma.

Translational relevance: It is useful to predict HFA24-2 test from HFA10-2 test, when the former is not available, in advanced glaucoma.