A Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Approach for Visual Field Test Forecasting.
Abbasi Ashkan, Gowrisankaran Sowjanya, Lin Wei-Chun, Song Xubo, Antony Bhavna Josephine, Wollstein Gadi, Schuman Joel S, Ishikawa Hiroshi
AI Summary
A hybrid deep learning model (Hybrid-VF-Net) improved glaucoma visual field forecasting accuracy and robustness, enabling earlier progression detection with fewer prior tests, even in challenging cases.
Abstract
Objective
Longitudinal assessment of visual field (VF) testing is essential in glaucoma management. Conventional VF forecasting methods require numerous prior tests, while deep learning techniques have shown promising results with fewer tests. This study introduces a hybrid deep learning framework to enhance flexibility and accuracy in VF test forecasting.
Design
A retrospective longitudinal study using deep learning-based VF forecasting models.
Subjects and controls: A total of 1750 subjects (healthy and glaucoma patients) with 19 437 Humphrey VF (24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) tests collected from longitudinal glaucoma cohorts at the University of Pittsburgh and New York University.
Methods
Three deep learning models were trained for pointwise forecasting of VF test data: (1) a recurrent neural network (RNN), (2) CascadeNet-5, a convolutional neural network (CNN), and (3) Hybrid-VF-Net, our proposed method that combines an RNN with a CNN equipped with depthwise transformers for both spatial and temporal modeling. The results were analyzed from multiple perspectives, including the impact of varying the amount of prior input data and how data reliability and disease severity influence VF forecasting performance.
Main outcome measures
Mean absolute error between predicted and actual VF test results was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation.
Results
We found that specific VF locations benefited more from either local or temporal modeling, and our proposed methods outperformed the compared approaches using a hybrid strategy. Hybrid-VF-Net exhibited greater resilience to data reliability issues, particularly in managing high false-negative rates often seen in moderate-to-severe glaucoma cases due to increased test-retest variability. Additionally, it demonstrated improved performance with fewer prior VF tests, thus reducing the waiting time needed for progression analysis.
Conclusions
The proposed Hybrid-VF-Net method outperformed the existing deep learning VF methods in terms of performance and robustness. Our findings highlight the influence of disease severity, data quality, and time displacement on forecasting performance, with certain VF locations benefiting more from either local or temporal modeling. Low reliability in data from moderate to advanced glaucoma cases continues to pose a challenge. Therefore, future research could refine temporal modeling and leverage larger datasets to further enhance predictive performance.
Financial disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
The Hybrid-VF-Net, a proposed deep learning method combining a recurrent neural network (RNN) with a convolutional neural network (CNN) equipped with depthwise transformers for both spatial and temporal modeling, outperformed existing deep learning visual field (VF) methods in terms of performance and robustness in a retrospective longitudinal study of 1750 subjects (healthy and glaucoma patients) with 19,437 Humphrey VF (24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) tests.
The Hybrid-VF-Net deep learning model exhibited greater resilience to data reliability issues, particularly in managing high false-negative rates often seen in moderate-to-severe glaucoma cases due to increased test-retest variability, in a retrospective longitudinal study of 1750 subjects (healthy and glaucoma patients) with 19,437 Humphrey VF (24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) tests.
The Hybrid-VF-Net deep learning model demonstrated improved performance with fewer prior visual field (VF) tests, thus reducing the waiting time needed for progression analysis, in a retrospective longitudinal study of 1750 subjects (healthy and glaucoma patients) with 19,437 Humphrey VF (24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) tests.
Specific visual field (VF) locations benefited more from either local or temporal modeling, and a hybrid strategy outperformed compared approaches, in a retrospective longitudinal study of 1750 subjects (healthy and glaucoma patients) with 19,437 Humphrey VF (24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) tests.
Low reliability in data from moderate to advanced glaucoma cases continues to pose a challenge for visual field test forecasting, highlighting the influence of disease severity and data quality on forecasting performance, as observed in a retrospective longitudinal study of 1750 subjects (healthy and glaucoma patients) with 19,437 Humphrey VF (24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) tests.
Related Articles5
Repeatability of Online Circular Contrast Perimetry Compared to Standard Automated Perimetry.
Observational StudySystematic Underestimation of Visual Sensitivity Loss on Microperimetry: Implications for Testing Protocols in Clinical Trials.
Clinical TrialEvaluation of the Consistency of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Using a Clustered SITA-Faster Protocol.
Cross-Sectional StudyVisual fields in glaucoma: Where are we now?
ReviewPredicting the Extent of Damage in the Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 Visual Fields Using 10-2 Test Results in Patients With Advanced Glaucoma.
Cohort StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.