The Association of Social Determinants of Health on Monitoring for Disease Progression Among Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Kanwar Kunal, Ramachandran Rithambara, Stein Joshua D, Andrews Chris A, Chaudhury Azraa S, Ige Maryam, Zhou Xueqing, Marwah Shikha, Li Yang, Evans Charlesnika T
AI Summary
This study found racial/ethnic minorities and those in rural/impoverished areas receive less guideline-recommended glaucoma monitoring, highlighting disparities needing targeted interventions.
Abstract
Purpose
To examine the association of race, ethnicity, and other social determinants of health (SDH) on receipt of optic nerve (ON) evaluation in accordance with National Quality Forum (NQF) and the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guideline-based metrics.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study consisting of 13,582 patients with POAG receiving care across 12 tertiary care health. The odds of receiving ≥1 ON evaluations to monitor for glaucoma progression over 45 months of follow-up was evaluated.
Results
White patients (61%) with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) had more guideline recommended ON evaluations during the 45-month follow-up period, compared with Asian American (52%) and Black (53%) patients (P < 0.001 for both). More non-Hispanic patients with POAG (58%) had ON evaluations in all 3 time periods compared with persons of Latinx ethnicity (52%) (P = 0.045). The odds of undergoing ON evaluations were 17% lower for Black patients compared with White patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.83; confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.94), 56% lower for patients living in isolated rural communities (OR = 0.44; CI, 0.25-0.77) compared to urban areas, and 9% lower for patients residing in more impoverished communities (OR = 0.91; CI, 0.86-0.96).
Conclusions
Racial and ethnic minorities and those residing in lesser affluent or rural communities are less likely to receive monitoring for POAG progression in accordance with NQF and AAO guidelines.
Translational relevance: This study aimed to determine the association between SDH and receiving POAG testing according to clinical practice guidelines, with a goal of identifying factors contributing to disparities in care. This should facilitate development of targeted clinical interventions for vulnerable patients with POAG while factoring technology, economic sustainability, and policy.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
White patients (61%) with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) had more guideline recommended optic nerve (ON) evaluations during a 45-month follow-up period, compared with Asian American (52%) and Black (53%) patients (P < 0.001 for both).
Non-Hispanic patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) (58%) had optic nerve (ON) evaluations in all 3 time periods compared with persons of Latinx ethnicity (52%) (P = 0.045).
The odds of undergoing optic nerve (ON) evaluations for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) were 17% lower for Black patients compared with White patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.83; confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.94).
The odds of undergoing optic nerve (ON) evaluations for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) were 56% lower for patients living in isolated rural communities (OR = 0.44; CI, 0.25-0.77) compared to urban areas.
The odds of undergoing optic nerve (ON) evaluations for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) were 9% lower for patients residing in more impoverished communities (OR = 0.91; CI, 0.86-0.96).
Related Articles5
Absolute Risks and Decision Tools for Communicating the Risks of Visual Impairment From Myopia-Related Diseases.
ReviewImpact of smoking on glaucoma.
ReviewThe Association among Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Medications, and Glaucoma in a Nationwide Electronic Health Records Database.
Cohort StudyPredictive Analytics for Glaucoma Using Data From the All of Us Research Program.
Cohort StudyThe Effect of Age on Increasing Susceptibility to Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Glaucoma.
Cohort StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.