Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Br J OphthalmolDecember 20250 citations

Assessment of dry eye questionnaires in patients with and without glaucoma.

Coco Giulia, Piccotti Giulia, Rossi Leopoldo, Fucci Pasquale, Manni Gianluca


AI Summary

This study found that in advanced glaucoma, the OSDI dry eye questionnaire's results diverged from other questionnaires and were influenced by visual field damage, suggesting careful questionnaire selection is crucial.

Abstract

Aim

To compare the results of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) and Symptom Assessment Questionnaire iN Dry Eye (SANDE) in patients without glaucoma and with glaucoma at different stages of severity.

Methods

Cross-sectional study including patients who underwent visual field (VF) testing, completed three dry eye disease (DED) questionnaires and had ocular surface examination. Glaucoma severity was staged by averaging the severity grade of both eyes using mean deviation (MD) thresholds as mild (MD≥-6 dB), moderate (-6>MD≥-12 dB) and advanced (MD<-12 dB). Questionnaire results, pairwise correlations and predictors for each questionnaire result were assessed.

Results

147 patients with a mean age of 65.8±12.5 years were included. OSDI showed moderate-to-high correlations with DEQ-5 and SANDE in patients without glaucoma (n=43) and with mild-to-moderate (n=32 and n=56) VF damage (always ρ≥0.55; p<0.01 with DEQ-5 and ρ≥0.5; p<0.01 with SANDE); while correlations became low and non-significant in advanced glaucoma (n=16) (ρ:0.38; p=0.60 and ρ:0.41; p=0.464 with DEQ-5 and SANDE, respectively). Conversely, DEQ-5 and SANDE always showed significant correlations (ρ≥0.66; p<0.01). Linear regression showed the OSDI to be the only questionnaire affected by mean MD (p=0.002). Additionally, glaucoma patients were more frequently defined as symptomatic for DED using the OSDI compared with the DEQ-5 (65.4% vs 51.9%; p=0.0082).

Conclusion

DED questionnaires showed different behaviours in patients with glaucoma. The OSDI failed to maintain its correlation with both the DEQ-5 and SANDE in advanced glaucoma stages and was the only questionnaire influenced by VF damage. Questionnaire choice may influence how DED symptoms are captured in glaucoma patients, particularly in advanced stages.


Key Concepts5

Correlations between the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and both the 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) and Symptom Assessment Questionnaire iN Dry Eye (SANDE) became low and non-significant in patients with advanced glaucoma (n=16), with ρ=0.38 (p=0.60) with DEQ-5 and ρ=0.41 (p=0.464) with SANDE.

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=147 patientsCh6Ch12

Linear regression analysis in a cross-sectional study of 147 patients showed the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) to be the only questionnaire affected by mean visual field mean deviation (MD) (p=0.002).

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=147 patientsCh6Ch12

Glaucoma patients were more frequently defined as symptomatic for dry eye disease (DED) using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) compared with the 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) (65.4% vs 51.9%; p=0.0082) in a cross-sectional study of 147 patients.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=147 patientsCh6Ch12

The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) showed moderate-to-high correlations with the 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) and Symptom Assessment Questionnaire iN Dry Eye (SANDE) in patients without glaucoma (n=43) and with mild-to-moderate visual field (VF) damage (n=32 and n=56, respectively), with ρ≥0.55 (p<0.01) with DEQ-5 and ρ≥0.5 (p<0.01) with SANDE.

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=147 patientsCh6Ch12

The 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) and Symptom Assessment Questionnaire iN Dry Eye (SANDE) always showed significant correlations (ρ≥0.66; p<0.01) across all glaucoma severity stages in a cross-sectional study of 147 patients.

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=147 patientsCh6Ch12

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.