Corneal Biomechanics and Visual Field Progression in Eyes with Seemingly Well-Controlled Intraocular Pressure.
Bianca N Susanna, Nara G Ogata, Alessandro A Jammal, Carolina N Susanna, Samuel I Berchuck, Felipe A Medeiros
Summary
Approximately one-quarter of eyes with well-controlled IOP may show visual field progression over time. Thin cornea and low CH are main risk factors.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To investigate the incidence and risk factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in eyes with well-controlled intraocular pressure (IOP).
DESIGN
Prospective cohort.
PARTICIPANTS
A total of 460 eyes of 334 patients with glaucoma under treatment.
METHODS
Study subjects had a mean follow-up of 4.3±0.8 years. Patients were classified as well controlled if all IOP measurements were less than 18 mmHg. Rates of visual field progression were calculated using ordinary least-squares linear regression of standard automated perimetry (SAP) mean deviation (MD) values over time. Progression was defined as a significantly negative MD slope (alpha = 0.05).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Rates of SAP MD change; mean and peak IOP, and IOP fluctuation; and corneal biomechanics: corneal hysteresis (CH), central corneal thickness (CCT), and corneal index.
RESULTS
Of the 179 eyes with well-controlled IOP, 42 (23.5%) demonstrated visual field progression. There was no significant difference between progressing and stable patients in baseline MD (-6.4±7.1 decibels [dB] vs. -6.0±6.2 dB; P = 0.346), mean IOP (11.7±2.0 mmHg vs. 12.1±2.3 mmHg; P = 0.405), IOP fluctuation (1.6±0.6 mmHg vs. 1.6±0.5 mmHg; P = 0.402), or peak IOP (14.3±1.9 mmHg vs. 14.6±2.1 mmHg; P = 0.926). Progressing eyes had significantly lower CH (8.6±1.3 mmHg vs. 9.4±1.6 mmHg; P = 0.014) and thinner CCT (515.1±33.1 μm vs. 531.1±42.4 μm; P = 0.018, respectively) compared with stable eyes. In the multivariate analysis, a 1 standard deviation lower corneal index, a summation of normalized versions of CH and CCT, resulted in a 68% higher risk of progression (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.62; P = 0.021).
CONCLUSIONS
Approximately one-quarter of eyes with well-controlled IOP may show visual field progression over time. Thin cornea and low CH are main risk factors.
More by Bianca N Susanna
View full profile →Reply.
Association between Rates of Visual Field Progression and Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Different Tonometers.
A Prospective Longitudinal Study to Investigate Corneal Hysteresis as a Risk Factor for Predicting Development of Glaucoma.
Top Research in Visual Field
Browse all →Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications.
Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.