Ophthalmology
OphthalmologyDecember 2022Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Machine-Identified Patterns of Visual Field Loss and an Association with Rapid Progression in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Visual FieldDisease Progression

Summary

An automated machine learning system can identify patterns of VF loss and could provide objective and reproducible nomenclature for characterizing early signs of visual defects and rapid progression in patients with glaucoma.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify patterns of visual field (VF) loss based on unsupervised machine learning and to identify patterns that are associated with rapid progression.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2231 abnormal VFs from 205 eyes of 176 Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) participants followed over approximately 16 years.

METHODS

Visual fields were assessed by an unsupervised deep archetypal analysis algorithm and an OHTS-certified VF reader to identify prevalent patterns of VF loss. Machine-identified patterns of glaucoma damage were compared against those patterns previously identified (expert-identified) in the OHTS in 2003. Based on the longitudinal VFs of each eye, VF loss patterns that were strongly associated with rapid glaucoma progression were identified.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Machine-expert correspondence and type of patterns of VF loss associated with rapid progression.

RESULTS

The average VF mean deviation (MD) at conversion to glaucoma was -2.7 decibels (dB) (standard deviation [SD] = 2.4 dB), whereas the average MD of the eyes at the last visit was -5.2 dB (SD = 5.5 dB). Fifty out of 205 eyes had MD rate of -1 dB/year or worse and were considered rapid progressors. Eighteen machine-identified patterns of VF loss were compared with expert-identified patterns, in which 13 patterns of VF loss were similar. The most prevalent expert-identified patterns included partial arcuate, paracentral, and nasal step defects, and the most prevalent machine-identified patterns included temporal wedge, partial arcuate, nasal step, and paracentral VF defects. One of the machine-identified patterns of VF loss predicted future rapid VF progression after adjustment for age, sex, and initial MD.

CONCLUSIONS

An automated machine learning system can identify patterns of VF loss and could provide objective and reproducible nomenclature for characterizing early signs of visual defects and rapid progression in patients with glaucoma.

Keywords

Artificial intelligenceDeep archetypal analysisPatterns of visual field lossRapid glaucoma progressionUnsupervised machine learning

Discussion

Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.