Comparison of Structural and Functional Features in Primary Angle Closure and Open Angle Glaucomas.
Jessica A Sun, Melissa Yuan, Grace E Johnson, Louis R Pasquale, Michael V Boland, David S Friedman, Tobias Elze, Lucy Q Shen, Mengyu Wang
Summary
Patients with PACG had less structural damage than patients with POAG despite similar degrees of functional loss.
Abstract
PRCIS
Using a large data set, we showed structural and functional differences between primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Primary angle closure glaucoma has relative structural preservation and worse functional loss inferiorly.
PURPOSE
To identify structural and functional differences in PACG and POAG.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this large cross-sectional study, differences in structural and functional damage were assessed among patients with POAG and PACG with optical coherence tomography and reliable visual field testing.
RESULTS
In all, 283 patients with PACG and 4110 patients with POAG were included. Despite similar mean deviation on visual fields (mean [SD] -7.73 [7.92] vs. -7.53 [6.90] dB, P =0.72), patients with PACG had thicker global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), smaller cup volume, smaller cup-to-disc ratio, and larger rim area than POAG (77 [20] vs. 71 [14] µm, 0.32 [0.28] vs. 0.40 [0.29] mm 3 , 0.6 [0.2] vs. 0.7 [0.1], 1.07 [0.40] vs. 0.89 [0.30] mm 2 , P <0.001 for all), while patients with POAG had more pronounced inferior RNFL thinning (82 [24] vs. 95 [35] µm, P <0.001). In a multivariable analysis, hyperopia [odds ratio (OR): 1.24, confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.37], smaller cup-to-disc ratio (OR: 0.69,
CI
0.61-0.78), thicker inferior RNFL (OR: 1.15,
CI
1.06-1.26) and worse mean deviation (OR: 0.95,
CI
0.92-0.98) were associated with PACG. Functionally, POAG was associated with superior paracentral loss and PACG with inferior field loss. After adjusting for average RNFL thickness, PACG was associated with more diffuse loss than POAG (total deviation differences 1.26-3.2 dB).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with PACG had less structural damage than patients with POAG despite similar degrees of functional loss. Regional differences in patterns of functional and structural loss between POAG and PACG may improve disease monitoring for these glaucoma subtypes.
More by Jessica A Sun
View full profile →Artifact Correction in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps Using Deep Learning and Its Clinical Utility in Glaucoma.
Artifacts in OCT Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Imaging in Patients with Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1.
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Patients With the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1.
Top Research in Visual Field
Browse all →Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications.
Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.