Short-wavelength automated perimetry: it's role in the clinic and for understanding ganglion cell function.
AI Summary
SWAP is more sensitive than standard tests for early glaucoma detection and progression, revealing individual ganglion cell subtype differences, crucial for monitoring disease and treatment effectiveness.
Abstract
Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) is a more sensitive test than standard achromatic perimetry for early loss of vision due to glaucoma and other ocular and neurological diseases. SWAP is also more successful for detecting changes in vision as glaucoma progresses. Results from various visual function-specific tests, including SWAP, suggest that there are individual differences in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma eyes in the subtype of ganglion cell first affected. However, the disease targets the same retinal area for all function-specific tests that show a deficit in a given individual. Psychophysical tests of vision are critical to understand glaucoma's effect on retinal ganglion cells, to verify the success or failure of treatment including new neuroprotective agents, and to determine the relationship of genetic markers for glaucoma to the presence and progress of the disease.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Related Articles5
Archetypal analysis quantifies changes in patterns of visual field loss in eyes with acute non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy.
Observational StudyFactors associated with vision loss in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients with severe papilledema.
Cohort StudyComparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects.
Observational StudyMicroperimetry Characteristics of Regions With a Truly Nonresponding Location: Implications for Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Observational StudyValidation of a Wearable Virtual Reality Perimeter for Glaucoma Staging, The NOVA Trial: Novel Virtual Reality Field Assessment.
Clinical TrialIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.