Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

OphthalmologyApril 200231 citations

Predictive value of short-wavelength automated perimetry: a 3-year follow-up study.

Polo Vicente, Larrosa Jose M, Pinilla Isabel, Perez Susana, Gonzalvo Francisco, Honrubia Francisco M


AI Summary

This study found early RNFL and SWAP abnormalities in glaucoma suspects predict future standard visual field loss, highlighting their value for early detection and intervention.

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether structural changes in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and functional abnormalities in short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) can predict the onset of functional losses in standard automated perimetry patients suspected of having glaucoma.

Design

Prospective observational case series.

Participants

A total of 160 eyes of ocular hypertensive subjects (intraocular pressure greater than 21 mmHg and normal standard automated perimetry) were included in the study.

Interventions

The subjects underwent RNFL photographic evaluation and SWAP. Standard automated perimetries were repeated after 3 years to evaluate glaucomatous losses.

Main outcome measures

Onset of glaucomatous defects in conventional automated perimetry after 3 years of follow-up, with or without prior glaucomatous defects in RNFL and SWAP.

Results

At the beginning of the study, 77 eyes showed RNFL losses (48%), and 58 eyes showed abnormalities in SWAP (36%). After the 3-year follow-up period, 14 of 77 eyes with RNFL losses had standard automated perimetry abnormalities (predicting sensitivity 93%), whereas 11 of 58 eyes with abnormal SWAP had standard automated perimetry losses (73% sensitivity).

Conclusions

RNFL and SWAP losses are signs of early glaucomatous damage and can predict functional losses in standard automated perimetry.


MeSH Terms

AdultFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOcular HypertensionPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRetinal Ganglion CellsVision DisordersVisual Field TestsVisual Fields

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.