A Protective Eye Shield Reduces Limbal Strain and Its Variability During Simulated Sleep in Adults With Glaucoma.
Flatau Alison, Solano Francisco, Jefferys Joan L, Damion Christopher, Quigley Harry A
AI Summary
A protective eye shield reduced limbal strain and its variability during face-down sleep in glaucoma patients, especially those with worsening vision, suggesting a simple way to mitigate potential ocular stress.
Abstract
Purpose
To determine the effect of wearing a protective eye shield (mask) on limbal strain magnitude and variability in glaucoma eyes when sleeping with 1 side of the face down (FD) against a pillow.
Methods
A prospective, randomized, interventional trial was conducted at the Wilmer Eye Institute with 36 glaucoma patients. A contact lens sensor measured limbal strain (output in equivalent millivolts) during intervals of up to 60 minutes in lateral decubitus, FD, and supine positions. Eighteen subjects wore a mask during 1 of 2 FD intervals, with randomized assignment of the interval. Data from additional trials with no mask were included in some analyses. In addition, some facial-feature dimensions from 3D scanned images of 23 subjects were compared with limbal strain data.
Results
Wearing a mask trends toward a reduced mean change in contact lens sensor output (limbal strain) on moving to a FD positions [+34.1 mVeq, P=0.01 reduced by -22.3 mVeq, P=0.09 (n=36)]. Mask wearing reduced variability in strain while FD [-22.8 mVeq, P=0.04 (n=18)]. In eyes with past progressive visual field loss, the effect of the mask reduced mean strain change when moving to FD [-44.8 mVeq, P=0.02 (n=31)]. Longer corneal apex to nose-tip and to temple lengths were associated with reduced variability while FD [P=0.02 and 0.04, respectively (n=23)]. Treating both lengths as confounding factors increased statistical significance, particularly for analysis of the no-mask change in strain data moving to and from the FD position [P=0.004 to 0.002 and P=0.03 to 0.01 (n=23)].
Conclusion and relevance: Wearing a mask reduced limbal strain and variation in limbal strain during simulated FD sleep, particularly in eyes with past field worsening, as did some facial features.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
Wearing a protective eye shield (mask) trends toward a reduced mean change in contact lens sensor output (limbal strain) on moving to a face-down position in adults with glaucoma, with a reduction of -22.3 mVeq (P=0.09) from an initial +34.1 mVeq (P=0.01) (n=36).
Wearing a protective eye shield (mask) reduced variability in limbal strain while in a face-down position by -22.8 mVeq (P=0.04) in adults with glaucoma (n=18).
In eyes with past progressive visual field loss in adults with glaucoma, wearing a protective eye shield (mask) reduced mean limbal strain change when moving to a face-down position by -44.8 mVeq (P=0.02) (n=31).
Longer corneal apex to nose-tip and to temple lengths were associated with reduced variability in limbal strain while in a face-down position (P=0.02 and P=0.04, respectively) in adults with glaucoma (n=23).
Related Articles5
Glaucoma 2.0: neuroprotection, neuroregeneration, neuroenhancement.
ReviewNeuroprotection in glaucoma: recent advances and clinical translation.
ReviewGlaucoma: now and beyond.
ReviewOcular blood flow in the progression and therapy of glaucoma. Symposium proceedings. St. Paul de Vence, France, March 10-13, 1993.
ReviewDelayed functional loss in glaucoma. LII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.
Case SeriesIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.