Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaJanuary 20180 citations

A Protective Eye Shield Reduces Limbal Strain and Its Variability During Simulated Sleep in Adults With Glaucoma.

Flatau Alison, Solano Francisco, Jefferys Joan L, Damion Christopher, Quigley Harry A


AI Summary

A protective eye shield reduced limbal strain and its variability during face-down sleep in glaucoma patients, especially those with worsening vision, suggesting a simple way to mitigate potential ocular stress.

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the effect of wearing a protective eye shield (mask) on limbal strain magnitude and variability in glaucoma eyes when sleeping with 1 side of the face down (FD) against a pillow.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, interventional trial was conducted at the Wilmer Eye Institute with 36 glaucoma patients. A contact lens sensor measured limbal strain (output in equivalent millivolts) during intervals of up to 60 minutes in lateral decubitus, FD, and supine positions. Eighteen subjects wore a mask during 1 of 2 FD intervals, with randomized assignment of the interval. Data from additional trials with no mask were included in some analyses. In addition, some facial-feature dimensions from 3D scanned images of 23 subjects were compared with limbal strain data.

Results

Wearing a mask trends toward a reduced mean change in contact lens sensor output (limbal strain) on moving to a FD positions [+34.1 mVeq, P=0.01 reduced by -22.3 mVeq, P=0.09 (n=36)]. Mask wearing reduced variability in strain while FD [-22.8 mVeq, P=0.04 (n=18)]. In eyes with past progressive visual field loss, the effect of the mask reduced mean strain change when moving to FD [-44.8 mVeq, P=0.02 (n=31)]. Longer corneal apex to nose-tip and to temple lengths were associated with reduced variability while FD [P=0.02 and 0.04, respectively (n=23)]. Treating both lengths as confounding factors increased statistical significance, particularly for analysis of the no-mask change in strain data moving to and from the FD position [P=0.004 to 0.002 and P=0.03 to 0.01 (n=23)].

Conclusion and relevance: Wearing a mask reduced limbal strain and variation in limbal strain during simulated FD sleep, particularly in eyes with past field worsening, as did some facial features.


MeSH Terms

AdultContact LensesCorneal DiseasesEye Protective DevicesFemaleGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureLimbus CorneaeMalePatient PositioningProspective StudiesSleepStress, Physiological

Key Concepts4

Wearing a protective eye shield (mask) trends toward a reduced mean change in contact lens sensor output (limbal strain) on moving to a face-down position in adults with glaucoma, with a reduction of -22.3 mVeq (P=0.09) from an initial +34.1 mVeq (P=0.01) (n=36).

TreatmentRCTProspective, randomized, interventional trialn=36 glaucoma patientsCh1Ch28

Wearing a protective eye shield (mask) reduced variability in limbal strain while in a face-down position by -22.8 mVeq (P=0.04) in adults with glaucoma (n=18).

TreatmentRCTProspective, randomized, interventional trialn=18 glaucoma patientsCh1Ch28

In eyes with past progressive visual field loss in adults with glaucoma, wearing a protective eye shield (mask) reduced mean limbal strain change when moving to a face-down position by -44.8 mVeq (P=0.02) (n=31).

TreatmentRCTProspective, randomized, interventional trialn=31 glaucoma patients with past progre…Ch1Ch6Ch28

Longer corneal apex to nose-tip and to temple lengths were associated with reduced variability in limbal strain while in a face-down position (P=0.02 and P=0.04, respectively) in adults with glaucoma (n=23).

MechanismCross-sectionalCross-sectional analysis of 3D scanned imagesn=23 glaucoma patientsCh1Ch4

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.