Performance of a Glaucoma Screening Program Compared With Opportunistic Detection in China.
Xie Yanqian, Jiang Junhong, Liu Chi, Lin Haishuang, Wang Lin, Zhang Cong, Chen Jinyuan, Liang Yuanbo, Congdon Nathan, Zhang Shaodan
AI Summary
Health center glaucoma screening effectively detects early-stage disease, including normal-tension glaucoma, with less visual impairment than clinic detection, improving early intervention.
Abstract
Prcis: Health examination center-based screening provide a good supplement to clinic-based glaucoma care by detecting early-stage glaucoma, especially those with normal intraocular pressure (IOP) and less visual impairment.
Purpose
Opportunistic glaucoma screening for early case identification is of great value in the prevention of severe visual impairment, however, novel, low-cost models are needed. We aimed to determine whether health examination center-based glaucoma screening identifies diseases earlier than outpatient cases in China.
Materials and methods
In this case-control study, 76 patients with primary glaucoma identified from a health examination center-based glaucoma screening program and 272 consecutive outpatient cases at the same hospital were enrolled from March 21 to September 30, 2016. Demographic characteristics, best-corrected visual acuity, IOP, mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD) on Humphrey visual field testing in the better-seeing eye were compared between groups.
Results
Screening-detected glaucoma patients had significantly lower IOP (18.3±4.2 mm Hg) than out-patient cases (26.7±12.6 mm Hg, P <0.001). Most (71.1%) of the screening-detected patients had IOP<21 mm Hg compared with 37.1% in the clinic group ( P <0.001). Seventy-five patients (98.7%) in the screening group were diagnosed as primary open angle glaucoma, compared with 44.1% in the clinic group ( P <0.001). Screening-detected patients had significantly less visual impairment than the clinic group (6.6% vs. 38.6%, P <0.05). Mean MD (-4.4±5.0 dB) and PSD (4.4±3.6 dB) for the screening group were superior to the clinic group (MD: -16.5±10.5 dB, P <0.001; PSD: 6.5±3.7 dB, P <0.001).
Conclusion
The glaucoma screening program was effective at detecting early disease, especially normal tension glaucoma and supplemented opportunistic detection of glaucoma.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
Health examination center-based glaucoma screening identified patients with significantly lower intraocular pressure (IOP) (18.3±4.2 mm Hg) compared to outpatient cases (26.7±12.6 mm Hg, P <0.001) in China.
Most (71.1%) of the glaucoma patients detected by health examination center-based screening had IOP<21 mm Hg, compared with 37.1% in the clinic group (P <0.001) in China.
Seventy-five patients (98.7%) in the health examination center-based glaucoma screening group were diagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma, compared with 44.1% in the clinic group (P <0.001) in China.
Glaucoma patients detected by health examination center-based screening had significantly less visual impairment (6.6% vs. 38.6%, P <0.05) than the clinic group in China.
Mean MD (-4.4±5.0 dB) and PSD (4.4±3.6 dB) for glaucoma patients detected by health examination center-based screening were superior to the clinic group (MD: -16.5±10.5 dB, P <0.001; PSD: 6.5±3.7 dB, P <0.001) in China.
Related Articles5
Continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring in normal Chinese adults using a novel contact lens sensor system.
Observational StudyManhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Baseline Results and Costs of a Cluster-Randomized Trial.
Randomized Controlled TrialReal-Time Mobile Teleophthalmology for the Detection of Eye Disease in Minorities and Low Socioeconomics At-Risk Populations.
Cross-Sectional StudyClinic-Based Eye Disease Screening Using Non-Expert Fundus Photo Graders at the Point of Screening: Diagnostic Validity and Yield.
Observational StudyEffect of Intraocular Pressure on Aerosol Density Generated by Noncontact Tonometer Measurement.
Cross-Sectional StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.