Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaSeptember 20220 citations

Performance of a Glaucoma Screening Program Compared With Opportunistic Detection in China.

Xie Yanqian, Jiang Junhong, Liu Chi, Lin Haishuang, Wang Lin, Zhang Cong, Chen Jinyuan, Liang Yuanbo, Congdon Nathan, Zhang Shaodan


AI Summary

Health center glaucoma screening effectively detects early-stage disease, including normal-tension glaucoma, with less visual impairment than clinic detection, improving early intervention.

Abstract

Prcis: Health examination center-based screening provide a good supplement to clinic-based glaucoma care by detecting early-stage glaucoma, especially those with normal intraocular pressure (IOP) and less visual impairment.

Purpose

Opportunistic glaucoma screening for early case identification is of great value in the prevention of severe visual impairment, however, novel, low-cost models are needed. We aimed to determine whether health examination center-based glaucoma screening identifies diseases earlier than outpatient cases in China.

Materials and methods

In this case-control study, 76 patients with primary glaucoma identified from a health examination center-based glaucoma screening program and 272 consecutive outpatient cases at the same hospital were enrolled from March 21 to September 30, 2016. Demographic characteristics, best-corrected visual acuity, IOP, mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD) on Humphrey visual field testing in the better-seeing eye were compared between groups.

Results

Screening-detected glaucoma patients had significantly lower IOP (18.3±4.2 mm Hg) than out-patient cases (26.7±12.6 mm Hg, P <0.001). Most (71.1%) of the screening-detected patients had IOP<21 mm Hg compared with 37.1% in the clinic group ( P <0.001). Seventy-five patients (98.7%) in the screening group were diagnosed as primary open angle glaucoma, compared with 44.1% in the clinic group ( P <0.001). Screening-detected patients had significantly less visual impairment than the clinic group (6.6% vs. 38.6%, P <0.05). Mean MD (-4.4±5.0 dB) and PSD (4.4±3.6 dB) for the screening group were superior to the clinic group (MD: -16.5±10.5 dB, P <0.001; PSD: 6.5±3.7 dB, P <0.001).

Conclusion

The glaucoma screening program was effective at detecting early disease, especially normal tension glaucoma and supplemented opportunistic detection of glaucoma.


MeSH Terms

HumansGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressureCase-Control StudiesGlaucomaVisual Field TestsVision DisordersVision, LowChina

Key Concepts5

Health examination center-based glaucoma screening identified patients with significantly lower intraocular pressure (IOP) (18.3±4.2 mm Hg) compared to outpatient cases (26.7±12.6 mm Hg, P <0.001) in China.

Comparative EffectivenessCase seriesCase-control studyn=76 patients from screening program, 2…Ch3Ch10

Most (71.1%) of the glaucoma patients detected by health examination center-based screening had IOP<21 mm Hg, compared with 37.1% in the clinic group (P <0.001) in China.

Comparative EffectivenessCase seriesCase-control studyn=76 patients from screening program, 2…Ch3Ch12

Seventy-five patients (98.7%) in the health examination center-based glaucoma screening group were diagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma, compared with 44.1% in the clinic group (P <0.001) in China.

Comparative EffectivenessCase seriesCase-control studyn=76 patients from screening program, 2…Ch8Ch12

Glaucoma patients detected by health examination center-based screening had significantly less visual impairment (6.6% vs. 38.6%, P <0.05) than the clinic group in China.

Comparative EffectivenessCase seriesCase-control studyn=76 patients from screening program, 2…Ch6Ch10

Mean MD (-4.4±5.0 dB) and PSD (4.4±3.6 dB) for glaucoma patients detected by health examination center-based screening were superior to the clinic group (MD: -16.5±10.5 dB, P <0.001; PSD: 6.5±3.7 dB, P <0.001) in China.

Comparative EffectivenessCase seriesCase-control studyn=76 patients from screening program, 2…Ch5Ch6

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.