A Deep Learning Approach to Improve Retinal Structural Predictions and Aid Glaucoma Neuroprotective Clinical Trial Design.
Mark Christopher, Pourya Hoseini, Evan Walker, James A Proudfoot, Christopher Bowd, Massimo A Fazio, Christopher A Girkin, Moraes Carlos Gustavo De, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Robert N Weinreb, Armin Schwartzman, Linda M Zangwill, Derek S Welsbie
Summary
Our deep learning models were able to accurately estimate both macula GCIPL and ONH RNFL hemiretinal thickness.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To investigate the efficacy of a deep learning regression method to predict macula ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) and optic nerve head (ONH) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness for use in glaucoma neuroprotection clinical trials.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS
Glaucoma patients with good quality macula and ONH scans enrolled in 2 longitudinal studies, the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study and the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study.
METHODS
Spectralis macula posterior pole scans and ONH circle scans on 3327 pairs of GCIPL/RNFL scans from 1096 eyes (550 patients) were included. Participants were randomly distributed into a training and validation dataset (90%) and a test dataset (10%) by participant. Networks had access to GCIPL and RNFL data from one hemiretina of the probe eye and all data of the fellow eye. The models were then trained to predict the GCIPL or RNFL thickness of the remaining probe eye hemiretina.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Mean absolute error (MAE) and squared Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were used to evaluate model performance.
RESULTS
The deep learning model was able to predict superior and inferior GCIPL thicknesses with a global rvalue of 0.90 and 0.86, rof mean of 0.90 and 0.86, and mean MAE of 3.72 μm and 4.2 μm, respectively. For superior and inferior RNFL thickness predictions, model performance was slightly lower, with a global rof 0.75 and 0.84, rof mean of 0.81 and 0.82, and MAE of 9.31 μm and 8.57 μm, respectively. There was only a modest decrease in model performance when predicting GCIPL and RNFL in more severe disease. Using individualized hemiretinal predictions to account for variability across patients, we estimate that a clinical trial can detect a difference equivalent to a 25% treatment effect over 24 months with an 11-fold reduction in the number of patients compared to a conventional trial.
CONCLUSIONS
Our deep learning models were able to accurately estimate both macula GCIPL and ONH RNFL hemiretinal thickness. Using an internal control based on these model predictions may help reduce clinical trial sample size requirements and facilitate investigation of new glaucoma neuroprotection therapies. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Keywords
More by Mark Christopher
View full profile →Deep Learning Approaches Predict Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage from OCT Optic Nerve Head En Face Images and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.
Macular and Optic Nerve Head Vessel Density and Progressive Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Glaucoma.
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Features Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning on Optical Coherence Tomography Scans Predict Glaucoma Progression.
Top Research in Optic Nerve & Disc
Browse all →Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs.
Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.