Differential Impact of Central and Global Visual Field Progression on Quality of Life in Glaucoma.
Gopikasree Gunasegaran, Sasan Moghimi, Evan Walker, Takashi Nishida, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Massimo A Fazio, Christopher A Girkin, Linda M Zangwill, Robert N Weinreb
Summary
Central VF change had a greater impact on VRQOL compared to global VF change.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To determine the impact of progression of central visual field (VF) and global VF on vision-related quality of life (VRQOL).
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS
This study included 364 eyes of 235 primary open-angle glaucoma participants who had at least five 24-2 VF tests over a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The slopes of global mean deviation (MD) and central mean total deviation (MTD) (12 test points within the central 10° of 24-2) were calculated. Analyses were conducted using different slope thresholds to define VF-based progression, and mean composite National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Rasch-calibrated scores associated with these progression thresholds were quantified using linear mixed-effects models.
RESULTS
The baseline 24-2 VF MD of all participants was -5.6 (95% CI -6.4, -4.9) decibels (dB). At baseline, eyes with MTDprogression had significantly worse 24-2 VF MD compared to those without MTDprogression. When fast progression was defined as MTDslope <-0.50 dB/y, fast progressors had a mean baseline 24-2 MD of -9.71 dB (95% CI -11.89, -7.53) compared to -5.24 dB (95% CI -6.02, -4.46) in slow progressors (P < .001). Eyes exhibiting MTDprogression consistently displayed worse mean composite VRQOL scores across various thresholds compared to global MD. Notably, a similar level of VRQOL impairment was observed at a lower threshold for MTDcompared to MD, consistent across all glaucoma severity groups. In the overall cohort, eyes progressing at a rate of -0.5 dB/y or faster for MTDhad a mean composite VRQOL score comparable to those progressing at -1.0 dB/y or faster for global MD.
CONCLUSIONS
Central VF change had a greater impact on VRQOL compared to global VF change. Conventional assessments based on global MD may underestimate the effect of central VF changes. Refining progression detection strategies to include central VF is necessary to better reflect changes in patient-centered outcomes like VRQOL.
More by Gopikasree Gunasegaran
View full profile →Rate of Initial Optic Nerve Head Capillary Density Loss and Risk of Visual Field Progression.
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Optical Texture Analysis and 10-2 Visual Field Assessment in Glaucoma.
Deep Learning Estimation of 10-2 Visual Field Map Based on Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Measurements.
Top Research in Visual Field
Browse all →Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications.
Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.