Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

OphthalmologyApril 201714 citations

Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties between Indian and Chinese Adults.

Chua Jacqueline, Nongpiur Monisha E, Zhao Wanting, Tham Yih Chung, Gupta Preeti, Sabanayagam Charumathi, Aung Tin, Wong Tien Yin, Cheng Ching-Yu


AI Summary

This study found Chinese adults have lower corneal hysteresis than Indian adults, suggesting intrinsic corneal biomechanical differences, which may impact glaucoma risk assessment.

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the difference in corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) between Indian and Chinese populations.

Design

Population-based cross-sectional study.

Participants

Three hundred eighty-two Singaporean Indian persons and 764 Singaporean Chinese 50 years of age or older were included from the Singapore Indian Eye Study and Singapore Chinese Eye Study, respectively.

Methods

Participants underwent standardized systemic and ocular examinations and interviewer-administered questionnaires for risk factor assessment. The CH and CRF were measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY). Information on genetic ancestry was derived using principal component analysis. Linear regression models were used to investigate the association of CH and CRF with potential risk factors.

Main outcome measures

Corneal hysteresis and CRF.

Results

After excluding participants with a history of intraocular surgery, a diagnosis of glaucoma suspect or glaucoma, refractive surgery, or presence of corneal abnormalities, CH and CRF readings were available for 382 Indian persons. For each Indian participant, 2 Chinese participants were selected and matched for age and gender (n = 764). There were no differences in the clinical measurements of CH (10.6±1.6 mmHg; P = 0.670) or CRF (10.3±1.7 mmHg; P = 0.103) between the ethnic groups. However, after adjusting for covariates, Indian persons had, on average, 0.18-mmHg higher CH levels than in Chinese (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.38; P = 0.031). Consistently, CH level was correlated significantly with genetic ancestry in the Southeast Asian population. Corneal resistance factor level was not associated independently with self-reported ethnicity (95% CI, -0.10 to 0.29; P = 0.335).

Conclusions

Chinese have lower CH than Indian persons, and this disparity may reflect biomechanical differences of the cornea.


MeSH Terms

AgedAsian PeopleBiomechanical PhenomenaCorneaCorneal PachymetryCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalElasticityFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansIndiaIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsSingaporeSurveys and QuestionnairesTonometry, Ocular

Key Concepts5

After adjusting for covariates, Indian persons had, on average, 0.18-mmHg higher corneal hysteresis levels than Chinese persons (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.38; P = 0.031) in a population-based cross-sectional study of 382 Indian persons and 764 Chinese persons aged 50 years or older.

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalPopulation-based cross-sectional studyn=382 Indian persons and 764 Chinese pe…Ch10Ch16

Corneal hysteresis level was correlated significantly with genetic ancestry in the Southeast Asian population in a population-based cross-sectional study of 382 Indian persons and 764 Chinese persons aged 50 years or older.

MechanismCross-sectionalPopulation-based cross-sectional studyn=382 Indian persons and 764 Chinese pe…Ch9Ch16

Corneal resistance factor level was not associated independently with self-reported ethnicity (95% CI, -0.10 to 0.29; P = 0.335) in a population-based cross-sectional study of 382 Indian persons and 764 Chinese persons aged 50 years or older.

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalPopulation-based cross-sectional studyn=382 Indian persons and 764 Chinese pe…Ch10Ch16

Chinese persons have lower corneal hysteresis than Indian persons, and this disparity may reflect biomechanical differences of the cornea, according to a population-based cross-sectional study of 382 Indian persons and 764 Chinese persons aged 50 years or older.

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalPopulation-based cross-sectional studyn=382 Indian persons and 764 Chinese pe…Ch10Ch16

There were no differences in the clinical measurements of corneal hysteresis (10.6±1.6 mmHg; P = 0.670) or corneal resistance factor (10.3±1.7 mmHg; P = 0.103) between Indian and Chinese ethnic groups in a population-based cross-sectional study of 382 Indian persons and 764 Chinese persons aged 50 years or older.

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalPopulation-based cross-sectional studyn=382 Indian persons and 764 Chinese pe…Ch10Ch16

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.