Compliance With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Primary Open-angle Glaucoma Suspect Preferred Practice Patterns in a Retail-based Eye Clinic.
Stanley Jordan, Huisingh Carrie E, Swain Thomas A, McGwin Gerald, Owsley Cynthia, Girkin Christopher A, Rhodes Lindsay A
AI Summary
Retail optometrists' adherence to glaucoma guidelines was studied, revealing high compliance for basic elements but significant gaps in crucial tests like gonioscopy, visual fields, and target IOP. This could impede timely glaucoma progression detection.
Abstract
Purpose
To determine the level of adherence to the American Academy of Ophthalmology preferred practice pattern (PPP) guidelines for quality primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and POAG suspect (POAGS) care among retail-based optometrists.
Methods
Patients with a diagnosis of POAG or POAGS who participated in a telemedicine pilot project were included. Patients' charts were evaluated for 15 elements of PPP guidelines for glaucoma care. Results were further stratified by number of follow-up visits and diagnosis.
Results
Of 360 identified patients, 10 elements were documented in over 98%. Documentation of the remaining 5 components was as follows: dilated fundus examination 91.1%, central corneal thickness (CCT) 88.6%, visual field 78.9%, gonioscopy 47.5%, and target intraocular pressure (IOP) 15.6%. in total, 32.8% of patients were seen once, whereas the remaining 67.2% had multiple visits. In patients with multiple visits, providers were more likely to document systemic history (100.0% vs. 97.5%; P=0.0346), review of systems (100.0% vs. 97.5%; P=0.0346), gonioscopy (60.0% vs. 22.0%; P<0.001), CCT (94.2% vs. 77.1%; P<0.001), visual field (97.5% vs. 40.7%; P<0.001), and target IOP (22.4% vs. 1.7%; P<0.001) compared with single visit patients. In stratifying results by diagnosis, POAG patients more often received visual field testing (92.7% vs. 68.9%; P<0.001) and had an established target IOP (35.1% vs. 1.4%; P<0.001) compared with POAGS patients.
Conclusions
Compliance with PPP guidelines for glaucoma care was very high for most elements but lower for performing dilated fundus examination, CCT, visual field, gonioscopy, and target IOP. This study highlights deficiencies in care likely to hamper the detection of glaucoma progression.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
Among 360 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or POAG suspect (POAGS) in a retail-based eye clinic, documentation of dilated fundus examination was 91.1%, central corneal thickness (CCT) was 88.6%, visual field was 78.9%, gonioscopy was 47.5%, and target intraocular pressure (IOP) was 15.6%.
In patients with multiple visits (67.2% of 360 patients) for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or POAG suspect (POAGS) care, providers were more likely to document gonioscopy (60.0% vs. 22.0%; P<0.001), central corneal thickness (CCT) (94.2% vs. 77.1%; P<0.001), visual field (97.5% vs. 40.7%; P<0.001), and target intraocular pressure (IOP) (22.4% vs. 1.7%; P<0.001) compared with single visit patients (32.8%).
Among 360 patients, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients more often received visual field testing (92.7% vs. 68.9%; P<0.001) and had an established target intraocular pressure (IOP) (35.1% vs. 1.4%; P<0.001) compared with POAG suspect (POAGS) patients.
A cross-sectional study evaluated 15 elements of American Academy of Ophthalmology preferred practice pattern (PPP) guidelines for glaucoma care in 360 patients with a diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or POAG suspect (POAGS) who participated in a telemedicine pilot project.
Related Articles5
Relationship between intraocular pressure and preservation of visual field in glaucoma.
ReviewBiomarkers and surrogate endpoints in glaucoma clinical trials.
ReviewGlaucoma Home Self-Testing Using VR Visual Fields and Rebound Tonometry Versus In-Clinic Perimetry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Pilot Study.
Clinical TrialRecent developments of telemedicine in glaucoma.
ReviewCentral macular OCTA parameters in glaucoma.
Observational StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.