Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaJuly 20204 citations

Effect of Pharmacological Pupil Dilatation on Angle Configuration in Untreated Primary Angle Closure Suspects: A Swept Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

Narayanaswamy Arun, Baskaran Mani, Tun Tin A, Htoon Hla M, Aung Tin


AI Summary

This study found pharmacological pupil dilation worsened angle closure in 50% of primary angle-closure suspects. Shallower anterior chambers and larger lens vaults were linked to this increased narrowing, highlighting risk factors for dilation-induced angle closure.

Abstract

Precis: Angle-closure worsens with pharmacological dilatation in about 50.0% of the subjects diagnosed as primary angle-closure suspects (PACSs).

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in angle configuration with swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography before and after pharmacological pupil dilatation in untreated PACSs.

Patients and methods: A total of 106 subjects over the age of 50 years and diagnosed as PACSs were included in this cross-sectional cohort study. 360-degree scans of the angles were captured using swept-source optical coherence tomography before and 1 hour after pharmacological dilatation. The angle scans from swept-source optical coherence tomography were analyzed to calculate the iris-trabecular contact (ITC) index. The main outcome measure was to evaluate the change in ITC index after dilatation. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors influencing change of ITC index and to identify factors associated with increase in ITC index after dilatation.

Results

Majority of subjects were Chinese (93.4%) and female (79.2%). The overall mean predilatation ITC index was 45.3% (±23.7) and postdilatation ITC index was 46.05% (±25.9) with a mean change of 0.78% (±16.5; P=0.62). Fifty-three eyes (50.0%) showed an increase in ITC index (angle narrowing) after dilatation. An increase in ITC index was associated with shallower anterior chamber depth (odds ratio: 0.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.77) and bigger lens vault (odds ratio: 14.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.55-132.34).

Conclusions

Pharmacological pupil dilatation worsened angle closure in 50.0% of subjects with narrow angles. Shallower anterior chamber and bigger lens vault were associated with greater angle narrowing in these subjects.


MeSH Terms

AgedAnterior Eye SegmentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlaucoma, Angle-ClosureGonioscopyHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedMydriaticsProspective StudiesPupilSlit Lamp MicroscopySurveys and QuestionnairesTomography, Optical CoherenceTropicamide

Key Concepts4

Pharmacological pupil dilatation worsened angle closure in 50.0% of primary angle-closure suspects (PACSs) in a cross-sectional cohort study of 106 subjects.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional Cohort Studyn=106 subjectsCh13Ch28

An increase in iris-trabecular contact (ITC) index (angle narrowing) after pharmacological pupil dilatation was associated with shallower anterior chamber depth (odds ratio: 0.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.77) in primary angle-closure suspects (PACSs) in a cross-sectional cohort study of 106 subjects.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional Cohort Studyn=106 subjectsCh4Ch13

An increase in iris-trabecular contact (ITC) index (angle narrowing) after pharmacological pupil dilatation was associated with bigger lens vault (odds ratio: 14.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.55-132.34) in primary angle-closure suspects (PACSs) in a cross-sectional cohort study of 106 subjects.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional Cohort Studyn=106 subjectsCh4Ch13Ch19

The overall mean predilatation iris-trabecular contact (ITC) index was 45.3% (±23.7) and postdilatation ITC index was 46.05% (±25.9) with a mean change of 0.78% (±16.5; P=0.62) in untreated primary angle-closure suspects (PACSs) in a cross-sectional cohort study of 106 subjects.

MechanismCross-sectionalCross-sectional Cohort Studyn=106 subjectsCh4Ch13

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.