Role of Static and Dynamic Ocular Biometrics Measured in the Dark and Light as Risk Factors for Angle Closure Progression.

PURPOSE

To assess the role of static and dynamic ocular biometric parameters measured in the dark and light for predicting progression of primary angle closure suspect (PACS) to primary angle closure (PAC).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using prospective randomized controlled trial data from untreated, control eyes.

METHODS

Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Trial subjects underwent anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) imaging in the dark and light. Static biometric parameters were measured, consisting of angle, iris, lens, and anterior chamber parameters. Dynamic change parameters were calculated by subtracting light measurements from dark measurements. Cox proportional hazards regression models were developed to assess risk factors for PACD progression.

RESULTS

A total of 861 eyes of 861 participants were analyzed (36 progressors). On univariable analysis, TISA500 measurements in the light and dark were associated with progression (P < .001), whereas dynamic change parameters were not (P ≥ .08). In the primary multivariable model, older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.09 per year), higher intraocular pressure (IOP) (HR = 1.13 per mm Hg), and smaller TISA500 in the light (HR = 1.28 per 0.01 mm) were significantly associated with greater risk of progression (P ≤ .04). Dark TISA500 had similar significance (HR = 1.28, P = .002) when replacing light TISA500. Risk of progression was more predictive among eyes in the lowest quartile of light TISA500 measurements (HR = 4.56, P < .001) compared to dark measurements (HR = 2.89, P = .003).

CONCLUSION

Static parameters measured in the light are as predictive, and possibly more so, of angle closure progression as those measured in the dark. Ocular biometrics measured under light and dark conditions may provide additional information for risk-stratifying patients for angle closure progression.