Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Tafreshi Ali

16 articles in GJC

16 articles in GJC

3.

Semiautomated quantification of β-zone parapapillary atrophy using blue light fundus autofluorescence.

Mansouri Kaweh, Tung Jonathan D, Medeiros Felipe A, Tafreshi Ali, Dorairaj Syril, Zangwill Linda et al.

Acta OphthalmolAug 20131 citationsCross-Sectional Study

This study found that while individual graders consistently measured β-PPA in glaucoma using FAF or CSLO, agreement between different graders and between the two imaging methods was poor, limiting their interchangeability.

4.

Repeatability and reproducibility of Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.

Wang Allen Shawlun, Alencar Luciana M, Weinreb Robert N, Tafreshi Ali, Deokule Sunil, Vizzeri Gianmarco et al.

J GlaucomaFeb 20130 citationsObservational Study

This study found dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) was significantly more repeatable and reproducible than Goldmann and ORA in normal eyes, suggesting it offers more precise IOP monitoring for glaucoma management.

7.

Positional independence of optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Mansouri Kaweh, Liu John H K, Tafreshi Ali, Medeiros Felipe A, Weinreb Robert N

Am J OphthalmolOct 201211 citationsCross-Sectional Study

This study found optic nerve and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using OCT are highly repeatable and consistent whether patients are sitting or supine, supporting reliable glaucoma monitoring in various clinical settings.

10.

Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Leite Mauro T, Rao Harsha L, Weinreb Robert N, Zangwill Linda M, Bowd Christopher, Sample Pamela A et al.

Am J OphthalmolJan 2011103 citationsCross-Sectional Study

Different SD-OCTs measure RNFL thickness differently, showing fixed and proportional biases. Instruments are not interchangeable, impacting glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring, as patient factors also affect agreement.

15.

Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.

Tafreshi Ali, Sample Pamela A, Liebmann Jeffrey M, Girkin Christopher A, Zangwill Linda M, Weinreb Robert N et al.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciMar 200924 citationsObservational Study

This study compared SAP, SWAP, and FDT perimetry for glaucoma detection. Finding: confirming visual field abnormality is important and best achieved with a repeat SAP or SWAP test.

All 16 articles loaded